2008/12/11 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>: > No, I'm not "missing" it. Adding support for accordions or > rewriting the slur code to avoid collisions between phrasing and > normal slurs will take hours and hours, even for experienced > developers. Fixing a "programming error" warning when the > lilypond output is already perfect would only take a knowledgeable > person a few minutes.
Don't worry, I'm not suggesting to replace your Frogs with mine :-) Both sides are equally important, because it's the feature count that makes users *and devs* stick with Lily. > Once somebody has been doing small bugfixes for a few weeks, > they'll naturally start taking on bigger and bigger things. The > idea behind the Frogs is to get more people doing those small > bugfixes. The other stuff will take care of itself. Nothing takes care of itself. You taught me that :) > Umm, like this? > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=label:Bounty Nope, more like Jonathan's one (he's very clearly expressed why I think this should work big time). And in a visible place. Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
