On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Still a buglet: The stemwidth of the down arrow in the > > > `natural.arrowboth' glyph is too thick if compared to the other > > > arrowed natural signs. Everything else looks fine. > > > > Finally one with an instantaneous fix. :-) Indeed I used to check > > for up- XOR down-arrow before I added the accidentals with arrows in > > both direction. The attached version of the patches corrects this. > > Hehe, it's still not perfect. Sorry for being a PITA :-) Compile > with > > FONTFORGE=foo mf2pt1 --rounding=0.0001 feta20 > > and magnify into the connection point between the down-arrow and the > vertical bar: The `natural.arrowdown' glyph correctly extends the > vertical bar outlines into exactly the same direction, while the > `natural.arrowboth' extends the stem into a slightly different > direction, which is not correct. > > Additionally, the upper left point of the lower horizontal bar `jumps' > if compared between natural glyphs with and without an up-arrow. The > same is true for the lower right point of the upper horizontal bar for > glyphs with and without a down-arrow. > > <lilypond-devel@gnu.org><http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel> > (Thank you guys both for the continued tweaks to the arrowed accidentals!) Trevor. -- Trevor Bača [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
