2008/12/2 Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sorry for the late reply.
No worries. Thanks for taking a look! > Is there any reason that inner part of flat.arrowup and friends has a > different shape compared to a normal flat? See attached images -- > this looks like a buglet in your code. Besides that, everything looks > nice. You are right. It's caused by side effects of my changes in parts of the code which I didn't touch. Namely, upon taking a closer look I noticed that the reference points z3l, z3r, z10 depend on the position of z1r, which controls the thickness of the top end of the stem. For the arrowed accidentals I had to reduce this thickness a little to make them look nicer, but that had the unintended side effect of changing the inner part, too. It should be easy to fix but I'd like to investigate the effects of the fix somewhat more thoroughly and fiddle a bit more with the parameter to find an optimal value before resending the patch. However, I'm unable to compare the new accidentals side by side as in your images because I can only investigate them in the dvi file which is output by metafont. How do you produce these images? Are they just screenshots from fontforge or is it possible to export these kinds of pictures somehow? Also, how can I avoid recompiling all fonts after making changes (which takes ages)? Max _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
