2008/2/11, Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - If I'm reading this correctly, this is all a grand hack to add a
> > little staff to an instrument name. I don't see the essential
> > difference between this and
> >
> > \set instrumentName = \markup { \score { .. } the-real-name }
> >
> > except that this is longer, more error prone and less flexible. Again,
> > what problem are you trying to solve?
>
> The problem I was trying to solve is to separate the definition
> of the instrument name, from the one of the incipit. They are not
> the same thing, and should be entered separetely. It's well enough
> to explicitely write
> \set instrumentName = \markup { \score { .. } the-real-name }
> when you have a single piece to typeset. It really sucks when you
> have hundreds. (I have more than 600 pieces that would use this
> incipit thing.)
I though we had mechanisms to create more generic/parametrized markups.
> That would address the points you raised in your answer.
> Are you ok with this (much less enormous) patch?
This looks much better. I would probably just scm-ify
Score::add_output_def(), rather than have the optarg, though.
Please go ahead.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
