On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, at 10:09, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 4/22/20 7:33 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > Here is my non-proliferation question: > Is there significant use of MIT-0 in the field?
Almost all the sample, reference, teaching, documentation, and "blog" code published by Amazon is MIT-0. Except for the stuff for Alexa and for Lambda, and I'm hoping that changes. We like MIT-0 for that purpose because the intent is that our customers can remix it into their own applications with zero concern about the labor of maintaining attribution. I don't know if that counts as "in the wild" enough. It's a useful use case. Especially for companies who go to the effort to try to be fastidious about maintaining providence and attribution for open source code. We try to be, so we try to make things as easy as possible for our customers. ..m _______________________________________________ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address. License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
