On 6/3/2019 11:31 AM, Smith, McCoy wrote: >>> If new findings occur with currently-approved licences that are not making >>> it completely unusable, they ought to be kept, perhaps in a “grandfathered, >>> problematic, actively derecommended for new works” category. > Per the observation above, might there also be room for a "grandfathered, > non-OSD compliant, new works using this license are not Open Source" category? > > I'd be interested in volunteering if there ever were a committee to review > the current list to identify any listed licenses that do not (or might not) > conform to the OSD. Is there any way to find out if some of these licenses are even still in use (or ever were)?
Pam Pamela S. Chestek Chestek Legal PO Box 2492 Raleigh, NC 27602 919-800-8033 pam...@chesteklegal.com www.chesteklegal.com
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
