On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:55 PM Rick Moen <r...@linuxmafia.com> wrote:
But this seems surprising, because it's long been a settled > point that OSI's licence-reviewing program has no precedential > tradition, and would not aspire to one -- that this is not a 'stare > decisis' sort of place. > Indeed, it's more like an ISO registration authority: see <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registration_authority>, which decides all issues de novo. (But see below, even though this .sig was picked randomly from my list.) John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org How they ever reached any conclusion at all is starkly unknowable to the human mind. --"Backstage Lensman", Randall Garrett
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
