On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 11:32 AM Smith, McCoy <mccoy.sm...@intel.com> wrote: >
> [...] might there also be room for a "grandfathered, non-OSD compliant, new > works using this license are not Open Source" category? > > I'd be interested in volunteering if there ever were a committee to review > the current list to identify any listed licenses that do not (or might not) > conform to the OSD. I would also be interested in such an effort. FWIW the Fedora Project has identified OSI-approved licenses it believes do not meet the Free Software Definition (most of these, but I think not all, are based on the FSF's own judgments). Richard _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
