Smith, McCoy dixit: >problem with "grandfathering" such licenses is that they can be used >as precedent for new license submitters as to why their non-OSD >compliant licenses must also be approved.
That’s why we could have a category for them, to make clear that they are *NOT* precedent. (Classifying “new works are not Open Source” is a bit problematic, because what’s new. I’d rather disrecommend it but not disapprove.) bye, //mirabilos -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
