What would be nice i think is being able to respond to the patch set which is on gerrit via email, like you can do with bugzilla no?
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Thomas Arnhold <thomas-l...@arnhold.org>wrote: > On 02.05.2013 17:39, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > >> If we remove all the [PATCH] from the ML, what is left ? a >>> dev-discuss list ? >>> >>> It is already now the case that there is a disconnect between >> discussing code, or a concrete problem, and the subsequent gerrit >> patch submission (case in point: >> https://gerrit.libreoffice.**org/3699<https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3699> >> , >> https://gerrit.libreoffice.**org/3698<https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3698>and >> Noel Grandin's conversion >> operators for UNO thread), I'm very hesitant to widen that gap. >> >> Devil's advocate question: with that two-list proposal, where to >> discuss a given patch? ;) >> > > Hm right. Given the current state that gerrit patches are only "dumped" on > the ML a second list seems reasonable. But Norberts and Lionels arguments > are right, there is a need for discussion of that patches which is not > possible at the moment. > > Thomas > > ______________________________**_________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.**org <LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/**mailman/listinfo/libreoffice<http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice> > -- Jonathan Aquilina
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice