Hi, On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen <bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote: > > So, is there anyone who is _not_ a sponsored developer opposing to kill the > mail > spammage? If so: > > - could this be mitigated by a separate gerrit-patches mailing list? > - could this be mitigated by a daily digest of "gerrit news"? > - could this be mitigated by other means? > I vote to have a daily digest with just the newly subbmitted patches. I think it is important with some sort of visibility of the patch flow on the dev-list, for general heads-up on what is going on, and more importantly as an instrument to reduce risk of duplication of work.
I'm against having a separate mailinglist for this.i wouldn't subscribe to this list, and I guess newcomers will simply miss out on this. In this case pointing to those summaries ought to be enough https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/q/status:open,n,z https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/q/status:merged,n,z https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/q/status:abandoned,n,z http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log Maybe these links could be inluded into the daily digest as part of some standard introduction. /Albert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
