Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > The dev-ML is to discuss code. > code come as patch, and preferably as gerrit patch... so seing the > patch that are proposed via gerrit is the core function of the ML, > just like before gerrit they where posted to the ML . > Yup.
> If we remove all the [PATCH] from the ML, what is left ? a > dev-discuss list ? > It is already now the case that there is a disconnect between discussing code, or a concrete problem, and the subsequent gerrit patch submission (case in point: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3699, https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3698 and Noel Grandin's conversion operators for UNO thread), I'm very hesitant to widen that gap. Devil's advocate question: with that two-list proposal, where to discuss a given patch? ;) Cheers, -- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
