Randy McMurchy wrote: > Mike McCarty wrote these words on 07/21/09 12:19 CST: > >> However, so far I haven't seen a coherent LFS + BLFS since 6.3. >> I didn't build BLFS yet, because I was waiting for a coherent >> 6.4 mate BLFS. > > You may wait a long time. :-) We have very few contributors with > any spare time right now. > > >> Anyway, if the dev team could concentrate on coherence, I sure >> would appreciate it, > > See above, same thing applies. > > Mike, what I suggest is to just start building BLFS using the most > recent packages the vendor supplies. If something doesn't work, or > you have any questions, write in. Someone will respond (me if needed), > and we'll find a solution. Don't wait for a BLFS release, just jump > in and start building. > > Again, if something doesn't work, or you get stalled, write in and > let us know. Someone will get you over the hurdle. Chances are you > won't need much help, if any.
Let me add that getting a 'current' BLFS is almost impossible. There are about 300 packages in BLFS. It each only changed once a year (an many change much more frequently than that) it would be almost a package a day. It's a moving target and with lots of help we could get close, but in the long run, whatever we produce is only a snapshot. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
