Trent Shea wrote:
[...]
> So, I guess the obvious issue would be the state of BLFS right now, and how
> dirty you want to get your hands ;)
Precisely. I've built 6.3 once, and 6.4 four times, but so far
not BLFS, as I'm waiting for it to catch up. I'd like to see a
coherent release of LFS + BLFS. I want to leave the standard
distros and build/support my own, since I can't seem to find
a distro which isn't bloated with lots of stuff I don't want
or need, and find that somehow the distros are not flexible enough
to accommodate really customizing the install.
However, so far I haven't seen a coherent LFS + BLFS since 6.3.
I didn't build BLFS yet, because I was waiting for a coherent
6.4 mate BLFS.
Maybe I missed some news on the website?
Anyway, if the dev team could concentrate on coherence, I sure
would appreciate it, as my current distro is getting a little
"long in the tooth" and is no longer supported by anyone, not
even me :-)
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
