Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 01:37:30PM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> We disable keymap in -182, and have for (IIRC) a long time.  It's 
>> probably therefore better to keep the current state of things as
>> they are, and continue to not enable it.
>> 
> Looking at what was created, they all seem to be for (some) laptops 
> or netbooks.  I don't have any of those machines, and I've never 
> installed these keymaps so I can't look at what they contain.
> 
> The arch wiki
> ( https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Map_scancodes_to_keycodes ) 
> suggests this perhaps only applies to xorg (the 'media' keys added 
> beyond "standard" keyboards, if I'm reading it right), in which case 
> BLFS would be a better place to offer it as an option.

It seems to be mucking with the mapping from the keyboard hardware to
the value returned on /dev/input/eventX, changing the way the kernel
works.  It seems better to me to muck with the mapping from the value
returned on /dev/input/eventX to the X keysym -- inside the xkb
configuration, choosing a different keyboard setup inside an InputClass
section in xorg.conf.

It's not like media keys mean anything on a text (or fb) terminal.  :-)

But yes, BLFS either way.

> Now (wearing my BLFS hat) we're removing the ability to build them.

Ah, good point.  Hmm, I was forgetting about BLFS.  :-/

Interestingly for us, the systemd autofoo actually does provide the
ability to turn this on and off.  :-P

Well, if it remains an option (and likely off in LFS by default?) then
that seems fine.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to