Ken Moffat wrote: > libudev.la has installed=no - I'm not sure exactly how it gets > installed, but we probably need to do the same because the following > are wrapper scripts for libtool files of the same name in .libs and > these will definitely all need to be correctly installed : > > accelerometer, cdrom_id, v4l_id.
If udev follows standard libtool practices, they get installed by running the libtool script in the source tree (generated by configure), with the flag --mode=install and with further arguments that mirror how the library would normally be installed, i.e. "install -m755 libudev.la /usr/lib/libudev.la" (or whatever path). Same for the libtool-generated wrapper scripts. libtool is supposed to handle the dereferencing of the .la file to its .so in .libs, copying the .so into the target directory, etc. (Alternately, the automake-generated Makefile targets should also work, I would expect, as in one of the other posts in this thread? Not that I know which targets apply offhand.) > For the moment I won't even bother looking at how they get installed, > that would be premature until we can see what is present when we've > managed to build it in LFS. True. I might look in the next day or two as well, given what I know about autoconf/automake, but will definitely be watching to see what people come up with too.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
