On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:38:37PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > One bright note : although it uses a lot of libtool-foo in the > regular install, at the end of 'make' all the udev programs appear to > be ready for a conventional install, and libudev.la appears as if it > might be in a similar state [ needs further review ]. The static > and shared libudev are also present in .libs, together with the > version symlinks for .so. So, with judicious use of a few of the > rules in the Makefile (install-udevlibexecPROGRAMS, > install-includeHEADERS, install-dist_udevconfDATA, > install-dist_udevrulesDATA) and a little use of 'install' plus seds > to fix up man pages and udev.pc I think the LFS part of the install > can be done fairly easily. > Correction: *much* of it is ready for a conventional install. libudev.la has installed=no - I'm not sure exactly how it gets installed, but we probably need to do the same because the following are wrapper scripts for libtool files of the same name in .libs and these will definitely all need to be correctly installed :
accelerometer, cdrom_id, v4l_id. For the moment I won't even bother looking at how they get installed, that would be premature until we can see what is present when we've managed to build it in LFS. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
