Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:05:18AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Perhaps: >> >> # Generated by libtool >> # and customized by LFS >> > That sounds good enough. >>> That is good enough to get past that first problem (probably better >>> if Custom file was replaced by something to clarify it's not really >>> from libtool), but it then fails the same way that my attempt to use >>> the .so file (by hiding the .la) did: >>> >>> /usr/lib/libudev.so: undefined reference to `mkdir_parents' >>> /usr/lib/libudev.so: undefined reference to `startswith' >> Those are in src/shared/util.c. It needs to either be compiled with >> -fvisibility=normal or just directly included in the link line with the >> program to be built. >> >> Do you want me to create another patch?
> It's up to you. I'm planning to look at what has been happening in > the other approach, and also to do some non-computer things, but > I'll test it if you do create it. I may do that because it's actually pretty easy. Edit file(s), run diff, upload. Testing is just going to /sources in chroot: rm -rf syslogd-183 tar -xf syslogd-183.tar.xz cd syslogd-183 patch ... sh make.sh sh install.sh I probably should come up with an uninstall procedure for testing, but that's pretty trivial. > If you do create another one, please include the .so symlinks ;) I think I have already done that. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
