On Sun, May 28, at 09:23:27 Randy McMurchy wrote: > > You cannot expect to get realistic or meaningful responses until you > determine and specify: > > 1. What role does this team take? > 2. What are they responsible for? > 3. Why do we need it? > 4. What is different now that hasn't been in the past requiring this "team". > 5. What will be the name of this team? (UBKD?) > 6. Does this "team" have its own book? (every other "team" in the > LFS projects have a book (LFS, BLFS, etc...) > 7. You've thrown "kernel" into the mix. Why? > > Everyone needs to know the answers to these questions before "voting", > otherwise, as these things are determined there will be changes in > the "votes". >
First please *this* thread for answers and discussion about the proposal. Now some answers,with no particular order. Second, let's start from the look of the new book. #---------------------------------------------------------------+ a.'Handling Devises' (udev) b.'Boot process' (init schemes,bootscripts,bootmanager,etc) c.'Automounting Devises, Volumes, raid etc...' d.'Partitiong schemes,filesystems,etc' e.'Kernel issues.' #---------------------------------------------------------------+ As you see there is a connection between them. Are you considering the need (because I do have this need) of a central management to take care all of these issues? Hal -> boot-procces -> udev -> kernel. Are you happy with this answer? If you don't, speak right and I will try (although my time is limited) to make it more clear for you. Obviously everyone can share thoughts/ideas here,and also hopes and dreams ... hell why not, we can still dream can't we? :) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
