On 5/28/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If only to solve a political disagreement, sort of like an arbitrator, then great, but the only disagreement I see is there are two factions that want "their" set of rules used. I don't see a need to form a team to create a third set of rules and *many other things* thrown in. If this team was to act as an arbitrator, and settle the Udev rules issue, then as I mentioned, great. But bestowing more responsibility beyond that, for things that are perfectly fine as they are, clouds the meaning to me.
Well said. Why not have the new team create a common set of rules? After that the team would which part belongs to LFS, which belongs to CLFS and which to BLFS and then add those to the appropriate books and let the respective books maintain it from then on. Changes needed after that would then go thru the normal discussion route. -- Tushar Teredesai mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
