Archaic wrote these words on 05/23/06 11:00 CST: > One of the reasons for keeping Xfree was because it was nearly > maintenance free. The package itself may be, but obviously anything that > uses X components requires a lot of hassle only because of Xfree. Does > any editor here use Xfree?
"A lot of hassle"??? You mean asking someone to do 'ls -l /usr/X11R6/lib/libXvMC*' and have them reply back 'yes' or 'no' is a hassle? I surely don't see it that way. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 11:01:01 up 11 days, 3:01, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.21, 0.18 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
