DJ Lucas wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Ag Hatzim wrote: >> >> >>> I would like to say,with all the respect ... "Freeze the damn thing >>> and both teams >>> be ready for a release" :) >> >> >> I would really like to update glibc and gcc for 6.2. Otherwise we will >> be behind the power curve. We don't want to get multiple revisions >> behind on these. >> >> -- Bruce > > Just to verify, glibc-2.4 and gcc-4.1 for LFS-6.2?
Yes. I haven't heard of anyone testing these yet, but after the udev update, adding them into trunk really wouldn't take long. There is no reason that a mid May release couldn't happen. That would give a month of testing. > If that is decided, > then we add a lot more testing time to delivery date, which I am > definately not against. I'd like to suggest revisiting our own > sanitized kernel headers for the release that contains glibc-2.4 and > gcc-4.1. That's a good point. It's probably the only remaining major issue. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
