Richard A Downing FBCS CITP wrote:
Well, that's that then.
Indeed :-( Thanks to you and George for forwarding the news on.
My own naive take on this is that Jim and co. should aim towards getting
the santizing script into a state suitable for review on LKML and have
it added to the kernel tarball, presumably with Makefile targets of
something like 'make userspace-headers' and 'make userspace-headers
install'. This would push maintenance of the script(s) over to those
who should have been doing it in the first place, and frees up our
resources for more LFS-specific tasks. Obviously, if Jim wants to
continue maintaining the scripts that's entirely up to him, but I firmly
believe that they should be in the kernel tarball.
Regards,
Matt.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
