On Mit, 2006-03-15 at 20:02 +0000, Matthew Burgess wrote: > Unfortunately, as Jurg points out earlier in this thread, there are > plenty of headers that are missing those guards and I'm not entirely > sure that such guards are a complete solution (if they were I don't > think all the hairy looking `sed's I've seen on this list just recently > would be required).
At least some seds could be eliminated for sure, e.g. the [su](8|16|32| 64) type replacements are not necessary with non-broken upstream headers. Regards, Jürg -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
