On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, J�rg Billeter wrote:

I've now built about 550 packages on x86 and on x86_64 with my generated
header set and besides the few problems already mentioned before I've
got only two additional problems in the last 300 packages (one needed
header was missing and I had to add --with-pcap=linux to the configure
lines of libpcap and nmap), so IMO it's feasible. BTW: That's without
any "this time I'll include it for you" workarounds, with that there'd
be probably only one package with a problem so far, rp-pppoe.

Now, that _is_ encouraging. I only got into looking at the differences because a random version of the script failed to build glibc-2.3.6 on x86. Hmm, at least on x86_64 I was wrong about these messages coming from BLFS, on my latest build they ALL came from iproute2-2.6.14-051107, every time it included linux/socket.h.

Ken
--
 das eine Mal als Trag�die, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to