Jürg Billeter wrote: > Yes, LLH fails that criteria and it ships with a lot of kernel-only > stuff. Based on Jim's script I've written an extended version which > removes a lot of headers that shouldn't be part of the linux glibc > header set, AFAICT.
Cool. But one has to ask how you arrived at the list of headers to remove ie: what is your rationale? Also, the list of removals will likely need reviewing every new kernel release. Not great from a maintenance POV.. > Using that script on a patched 2.6.16-rc6, I've managed to get every > header compilable by itself (without -ansi but with -Werror) on x86 and > x86_64 system with gcc 4.1 and glibc 2.4. Excellent work. Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
