On 1/25/06, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew Burgess wrote: > > > 1) Have the two toolchain bugs (1675 and 1677 - note that 1675's title > > isn't entirely accurate!) fixed in LFS trunk. I'd need to re-read the > > discussions on those two to figure out quite what's wrong and how to fix > > them, or someone else could just post patches and I'll apply them > > instead :-) > > Matt, you still haven't addressed the issue that Ch 6 GCC and Binutils are > linking against the wrong libc. You broke this when you merged the GCC4 > branch to the trunk.. so I guess that means you get to fix it :-) > > Here's the thread. Should I file a bug so it doesn't get forgotten? > > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2006-January/054970.html
What's said in that thread is true. I did some analyis shortly afterwards. See this post for some long-winded results. http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2006-January/055149.html Having done the ICA, I can say that there is enough redundancy that the stripped binaries are not different when the extra steps used in DIY are followed. However, this doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed. Unfortunately, the *startfile_prefix_spec doesn't work (at least for me) on gcc-4.0.2. So, something different should be done. I don't have nearly the knowledge to propose something different, but I can say that the DIY Ch. 6 method works to keep things from linking into /tools. Just wanted to ping those results. -- Da -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
