If he wasn't good enough to play then he should never have been signed in the first place. And we've clearly lost money on him.
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 August 2006 17:28 To: Jim Moran; [email protected] Subject: RE: [LU] Livermore SOLD Why? This sounds like the most sensible thing I've heard all summer...READ THE REPORT!!! It appears Livermore was bought in case we didn't get Nicholls and "another potential midfield target", obviously that unnamed midfielder is about to sign and it better than Livermore. Blackwell has informed Livermore he'll be a sub or reserve next year and they've all agreed to sell him to Hull instead of having a decent wage rotting in the stiffs. Mark K. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist oh alright then :-)
