"This won't help you, as my KR1 buffets at 62 mph.(53 kts).  Haven't taken it 
into full stall yet.  That was with retracts down.  Plane is pretty much to 
plans, tho heavy (785 lbs) as flown. "

Hi Kevin

On the contrary - the data that you present is extremely useful indeed - thank 
you!

It is unfortunate for me in my dialogue with the Authority of course, but your 
figures are very similar to that collected for my aeroplane in 1978.  I know 
that the test airfield was 1335' elevation, so a cautious pilot would probably 
climb to at least 5000'amsl before stalling in a 'new' aeroplane.  This means 
that the finite wing on my aeroplane was working at a CLmax of about 1.4.

I will assume that your aircraft does not have flaps fitted, that it has an 
external balanced static port and that your data was also collected at 5000' 
altitude.  Colin Hales kindly passed me some KR-2 stalling information from the 
UK which indicated that the stall occurred 4 mph slower than the onset of the 
initial buffet at MAUW without flaps.  Using Colin's information, we can make 
an assumption that your aeroplane will stall at 58 mph, so a quick 'fag packet' 
calculation reveals that your wing is producing a CLmax of about 1.7.

I look at this from the point of view that I now have twice as many data points 
than I did this morning - again, thank you very much!

Kiwi


-- 
KRnet mailing list
KRnet@list.krnet.org
https://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet

Reply via email to