Hey John, Is your KR2 a taildragger or tricycle? I certainly share your neigative feelings about trying to flying the KR2 bird, despite that I almost finished everything by putting in nearly a good year of my weekend time on the project after bought it nearly a year ago... Honestly, my uneasy feelings about this KR2 is not so much about the control surfaces or anything related to the power plant or prop....My biggest concern is about the fact it is built by someone based on the original KR2 design with retract gear, taildragger, and worst of all the cable activated break system! My fear is that it may not be able to stop the bird after landing, needless to mention the risk of ground looping or lack of breaking power to perform engine runups before taking off...
Bottom line is that, the more I learn and work on this KR2 bird, the less confidence I have to ever want to take her into the sky someday....?! I bet your KR2 is already converted to hydraulic break and tricycle landing gear, to say the least, correct?! I would venture to guess that your bird is several times safer than mine to take her for the maiden flight...?! I have been praying that someone in this community would offer to help getting this bird to where she belongs - not in the hangar for sure! Kindest regards, Dr. Hsu 713 513 0423 On Thu, Jan 28, 2021, 12:32 PM John Gotschall via KRnet < krnet@list.krnet.org> wrote: > I have a kr2, 2180 turbo, I have never flown it. It needs work. > It is on stock gear. > > I have built and flown many shapes and sizes RC models over the decades, I > can sort of just tell by looking at the airframe, weight, and balance how > it will likely handle in flight. > > So every time I get the urge to work on my KR2 I get the feeling I won't > much like flying it. It's just too short in length, seems to me it will be > touchy and never will be nice and stable, easy to fly, decent airplane for > cross country. That depresses me and removes my motivation. > > Elevator response reports of which there are many reinforce the negative > thoughts. Also dismal spin test reports (video). > > For a long time I owned a Cessna 172. I really liked flying it, super nice > to fly. Really properly proportioned. > > I wonder if the kr2S would generally be more like the cessna to fly as > compared to the kr2. The longer moment with the longer fuse looks better. > Might be able to recover from a spin. Is more stable? > > I would like to buy a KR2S I think. When I go to work on it I would not be > discouraged by the short fuse. > > Any for sale near Seattle? > > thanks > > jg > _______________________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at > https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/. > Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html. > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change > options. > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org > _______________________________________________ Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/. Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html. see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change options. To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
