81JM is a joy to fly at forward CG and a miserable thing at aft CG. I haven't taken up passengers in a very long while for this reason. I once turned controls over to a CFI during a biannual and quickly took them back: "If I can safely get this thing back on the ground, will you pass me?" I did, and he did.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2020, 14:34 Flesner via KRnet <krnet@list.krnet.org> wrote: > On 8/9/2020 2:53 PM, Dr. Feng Hsu wrote: > > So, it could be dangerous even if the tail section is around 2 pond > > heavier than CG required, correct?! > > > > Kindly, > > > > Dr. Hsu > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > I don't know if anyone has tested C.G. range down to the change in their > pocket. Test are done on an individual basis and CG limits are > approached slowly. The pilot determines when they feel they are near > the limit. I believe rear limits are tested with a recovery chute in > case the rear limit is passed. Unless you have that option I'd stay on > the conservative side. Theory is only a guess. Flight testing proves > the point. > > Larry Flesner > > > _______________________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at > https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/. > Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html. > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change > options. > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org > _______________________________________________ Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/. Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html. see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change options. To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org
