Only the latest engines from Engenfellner? are decent at making good HP and
having reliablity, but they are heavy. The EA81 and EA82 engines are heavy
for the power produced. The EJ22 is a big improvement, but unfortunately
weighs in heavy also. It is also fuel injected which adds to the complexity
(may or may not be a problem).

The Rotax cannot compare to earlier Sub's because the Sub was never designed
to be run at those rpms continuously but the Rotax was. Like a motorcycle
engine they can live all day at 4500 rpms.

The Geo metro 3 and Geo/Suzuki 4 cylinder engines have overhead cams and
short strokes and larger bores for more power. The piston speeds of these
engines at 4500 to 5000 rpms is the same as a Chevy 350 at 3500 rpms, which
I know from personal experience will live all day at that rpm. With a good
PSRU that engine is reported to last as long as the Rotax or longer (TBO
time). They are all aluminum engines with reinforced sleeves where needed
for durability. Raven redrives makes PSRU's for them. Their weight is
similar to the Jabiru engine installed. Reported they are really popular
with the Ultralight crowd.

Corvair and VW have simplicity on their side. They have the least to adapt
and modify, light weight on install and decent HP.



-----Original Message-----
From: krnet-bounces+brokerpilot=bellsouth....@mylist.net
[mailto:krnet-bounces+brokerpilot=bellsouth....@mylist.net]On Behalf Of
Fred Johnson
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 4:04 PM
To: 'KRnet'
Subject: RE: KR> Subaru engines


Look at the Rotax though, it is a screamer too. At least to make the
horsepower.

Fred Johnson
Product Manager
T.E. West, LLC.

-----Original Message-----
From: krnet-bounces+fred=renotruss....@mylist.net
[mailto:krnet-bounces+fred=renotruss....@mylist.net] On Behalf Of D F
Lively
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:41 PM
To: KRnet
Subject: Re: KR> Subaru engines

Netters:

You raised some valid questions.  I have looked @ Subies and observed
that they
get Max torque somewhere in the low 4000s rpm range and Max power at say
the
mid 5000s rpm range.  Almost all would requre a PSRU because their
bearing wont
take the prop pull.  I would say that running that engine at max torque
for a
redline might have some durability issues as most in cars driver at
highway
speeds run in the 3000 rpm range so my thoughts are that limitting the
revs to
the mid or upper 3000s would be prudent and a PSRU ratio to give a prop
rpm in
the 2700 to 3000 range appropriate for durability.  Whether this would
leed to
adequate power availability I can not say.  What I liked about the Subi
is the
fact it is liquid cooled which would be nice for cabin heat with NO or a
very
limited risk of CO poisoning.

I think one must look at the RPM settings of the design and the PSRU
ratios
involved to evaluate engine logevity becuse clearly running an engine at
or
above its max torque RPM will surely work a hardship on engine life as a
general rule.

My opinion from a reasoned judgement not from experience or personal
knowledge.

IT is a Safe bet that neither the Corvair or VW based engines will last
as many
hours as they do normally if ran "Flat Out" either.


Don

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mark Langford wrote:

> Fred Johnson wrote:
>
> > Hey Mark, since it is so quiet today, do you know of anyone
successfully
> > using either a Subaru or Geo engine in a KR?
>
> Steve Makish and Bob Lester have a lot of hours on a Subaru (don't
know
> exactly which one).  They were big proponents until Steve wore his
case out
> a couple of times at about 300 hours.  His opinion is that they can't
take
> the RPMs, and are not worth the trouble.  He's now flying a Corvair.
He's
> not on the list but his email address is srmak...@aol.com if want to
email
> him direct and ask his opinion.
>
> Yes Ken Thomas also had a Subaru and is now running a Jabiru, and is
happy
> with it.  Dave Stroud weighed a Subaru engine installation firewall
forward
> and came up with 285 pounds, substantially more than "they" tell you
it'll
> weigh. The Corvair is about 245, by comparison.
>
> My 2 cents worth, but I've never flown behind a Subaru, so take it for
what
> it's worth...
>
> Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama
> see KR2S project N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
> email to N56ML "at" hiwaay.net
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
_______________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html



_______________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html



Reply via email to