----- Original Message ----- 
From: "gwvandor" <gwvan...@mb.sympatico.ca>
To: "KR builders and pilots" <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: KR>KR


>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "bill kirkland" <wkirkl...@rogers.com>
> To: "KR builders and pilots" <kr...@mylist.net>
> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 4:42 PM
> Subject: Re: KR>KR
>
>
> > Tim; I have two venturi's on my 150. there is no suction guage. They
drive
> > the DGI and A/H. They are mounted on the side ust aft of the engine
> > compartment. They are uncovered all year. Simple and reliable but don't
> > count on them in ice.
> > W.G.(Bill) KIRKLAND
> > kirkl...@vianet.on.ca
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Timothy Bellville" <soner...@worldnet.att.net>
> > To: "Robert Tate Gann" <bu...@usit.net>; "KR builders and pilots"
> > <kr...@mylist.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 8:47 AM
> > Subject: KR>KR
> >
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > I have a new "Old" question ,
> > > Where on the fuselage would be the best location for a 4"(10"
> > long)venturie
> > > to run my DG? I know there was a recent discussion about it but I
didn't
> > > follow it that close. now that I have come in to a great deal on this
> > > instrument I would like to use it.but I do not like the idea of using
an
> > > engine driven pump.
> > > The simplest thing to do is the venturie,right?
> > > Also does it need to have a shut off valve and suction gage? would
> > covering
> > > it on the ground be ok instead?
> > > Thanks
> > > Tim Bellville
> > > KR2
> > > N7038V
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html
> > the  venturie slow jou down10mph get diferent sourse suction!or go
> electric a/h!
> i have an old qestion=on the trailing edge of the kr1elevater what is the
> minimum up and down travel  please anibody help george vandor.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> see KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html
>


Reply via email to