Hi Em 17/07/2009, às 14:20, Lamarque Vieira Souza escreveu:
> Em Sexta-feira 17 Julho 2009, Gustavo Boiko escreveu: >> Hi (...) >> >> It is usually a better approach to analyze the backtrace of the crash >> than to start blindly setting pointers to zero after deletion. I'm >> not >> saying pointers shouldn't be resetted after deleting, but usually >> fixing a crash involves more than just doing that. > > For a particular case you are right. I did a mistake in not > nullifing deleted > pointers in my open inbox implementation, that caused a crash with > backtrace. > I thought that could be happening in other parts of Kopete source > code so I > started to analise them all. Sorry if that was a waste of your time. > For me it > was a good lesson on how to use delete and nullifing in C++ (I more > used to C > than C++). I didn't say it was a waste of time. In fact it was more a suggestion of a better way to face and fix crashes. It is nice to know you learned by doing this. If you need help on debugging kopete or any other KDE application, I will be glad to help, just drop by in #kopete on irc.freenode.net or private mail me. There is no problem about. In fact if you choose to private mail me, you can even write in portuguese (as we speak the same language). Cheers Boiko _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
