Has nothing to do with me not being good enough and you have no idea on the scope of my project. I can't believe you actually replied like that and honestly coming here to tell me you're serious. But to state something like that and to butt in like this is unbelievable. Do you do this to people at work? They'd probably kick your ass for saying something like that.
On Jul 9, 4:27 pm, Ricardo <ricardob...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's not meant to be derogatory, no. I've said that many times, it's a > fact isn't it? Sorry if it came out as rude. I could name dozens of > better programmers than I am, and I'm not pissed off by that! > > On Jul 9, 6:06 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to > > > do this for you :] > > > can I ask you if that was a derogatory statement? Seems like it to > > me. > > > On Jul 9, 3:34 pm, Ricardo <ricardob...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > "expresso" (we don't know your name), if you're still in need of help, > > > why not post an overview of what you need? You've posted several > > > pieces of your puzzle but no one can guess the overall structure > > > you're trying to code. Like "I need a carousel that expands when > > > blablabla and loads blablabla from json". And I'm pretty sure you have > > > an architectural problem there, the specific issues that pop up are > > > just a consequence of a lack of planning. > > > > Or just save your sleep time and hire someone with more experience to > > > do this for you :] > > > > And, please, try to keep discussions decently worded, and avoid > > > posting in sequence, specially if it's just pointless fighting, this > > > is a public forum. Thanks! > > > > On Jul 9, 4:45 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I understand. I have nothing that much against you Morning and I'll > > > > try to sound less abrasive in the future. Keep in mind I have been up > > > > till about 12:30am for about 4 nights straight on this so I am > > > > definitely trying all I could on customizing it and could not afford > > > > to just step back and say forget this plug-in because I had gotten > > > > much to far into it for our solution. > > > > > I am not one to just post and get freebies. Trust me, that's lame. > > > > > On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, MorningZ <morni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > It's been perfectly clear that whatever you are trying to accomplish > > > > > is anything *but* simple... and after two weeks of messing with it, > > > > > maybe it is/was time to cut your losses on trying to manipulate code > > > > > with which you have no idea what is going on under the hood..... > > > > > and code that someone wrote for free, supported for free, and has > > > > > since moved on...... the tablesorter plugin is the same way... it's > > > > > an older plugin that still works today, but people customizing it are > > > > > on their own... > > > > > > whatever... i've done my best to help and point out issues to this > > > > > point.... best of luck... looks like you'll need it > > > > > . > > > > > > On Jul 9, 3:33 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Funny thing is, I'll be blogging about this carousel. And you may > > > > > > find my implementation to be pretty complex but you would not know > > > > > > about the entire implementation and you assume that what we are > > > > > > doing > > > > > > is "simple" > > > > > > > On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >>>making it difficult to understand what you are asking > > > > > > > > tell me how it's difficult, I am very thorough in explaining the > > > > > > > situation and things tried. > > > > > > > > On Jul 9, 1:57 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > You've got it backwards.... it makes more sense and keeps the > > > > > > > > clutter > > > > > > > > out if you stay in the same topic..... > > > > > > > > > I did not say not to stay on the same topic. I said if I start > > > > > > > > veering off into anther discussion that's talking about a > > > > > > > > different > > > > > > > > approach (in this case in that previous thread I started with a > > > > > > > > question about obtaining the LAST <li>). Then I wondering maybe > > > > > > > > instead I can just iterate through the list of <li> and grab > > > > > > > > some by > > > > > > > > index. At that point, that's a whole different issue or scope. > > > > > > > > Yea, > > > > > > > > that time I should have stuck with the thread because I already > > > > > > > > committed to the question on the index. > > > > > > > > > Anyway I get it. But I should not be posting 2 different > > > > > > > > questions on > > > > > > > > the same thread which is what I try to avoid > > > > > > > > > On Jul 9, 1:54 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > how the hell am I being rude? > > > > > > > > > > And second, I am giving information to help you help me. > > > > > > > > > Again I try > > > > > > > > > all sorts of shit before I post stuff. I don't just post on > > > > > > > > > every > > > > > > > > > step of the way. I am showing you what I have tried. So you > > > > > > > > > either > > > > > > > > > get called out for not giving enough information or giving too > > > > > > > > > little. > > > > > > > > > > Chill > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 9, 11:04 am, MorningZ <morni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > "so it's only respectful on my part to > > > > > > > > > > start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off > > > > > > > > > > in the same > > > > > > > > > > thread. Not cool. " > > > > > > > > > > > You've got it backwards.... it makes more sense and keeps > > > > > > > > > > the clutter > > > > > > > > > > out if you stay in the same topic..... > > > > > > > > > > > As Liam points out.... you already asked the index > > > > > > > > > > question, AND it > > > > > > > > > > was answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 > > > > > > > > > > hours ago > > > > > > > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... > > > > > > > > > > > and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical > > > > > > > > > > question with > > > > > > > > > > 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all.... > > > > > > > > > > > Realize what this list for what it is: a mailing list > > > > > > > > > > where lots of > > > > > > > > > > us provide free help out of our own time.... > > > > > > > > > > > making it difficult to understand what you are asking, > > > > > > > > > > being rude to > > > > > > > > > > people trying to show you the way, rambling on and on with > > > > > > > > > > the same > > > > > > > > > > stuff.... all that doesn't lend itself very well to make > > > > > > > > > > your issues > > > > > > > > > > worth other peoples time and effort > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 9, 11:12 am, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Because sometimes I get into other topics not related to > > > > > > > > > > > my original > > > > > > > > > > > posts in those other thread so it's only respectful on my > > > > > > > > > > > part to > > > > > > > > > > > start a new thread on a different topic that's veering > > > > > > > > > > > off in the same > > > > > > > > > > > thread. Not cool. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jul 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter <radioactiv...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > how about reading all the replies to your other thread > > > > > > > > > > > > about this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > $("#mycarousel > li:eq(10)").css("margin-right", "5px"); > > > > > > > > > > > > > expresso wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it possible to target certain <li> in an unordered > > > > > > > > > > > > > list by index > > > > > > > > > > > > > with jQuery? I thought maybe I could use .index but > > > > > > > > > > > > > was not able to > > > > > > > > > > > > > get the syntax right. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought maybe something like this would work but is > > > > > > > > > > > > > has not: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $("#mycarousel > li").index(i).css("margin-right", > > > > > > > > > > > > > "5px");
