>>>and you blow up at my wondering why the author of that plugin put it on there... how the @#$% am i supposed to know?
if that's "blowing up" then you need to relax when you read replies. That in no way was "blowing up". On Jul 9, 2:24 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>Morning, then tell my why the code is putting that in there straight > > from the JCarousel plug-in > > Because previous to that, you were pretty cocky about the way you said > that disabled is not part of a <div> Read the post. > > YOu have to take that response above in context. I was in no way > trying to be cocky, just making a point that hey, it's in there so I > don't get why then. > > On Jul 9, 2:22 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Charlie, I have said thanks in a lot of my posts. > > > Second, I am customizing this control way beyond what most people > > have. And yes, it's pretty frustrating to say the least when you > > create a plugin and then disappear after 2 years. While it's open > > source, still. When you email the creator nicely asking him if he's > > still contributing and you get no response, and then the forums the > > pages for that Carousel are abandoned, one's got to wonder wtf. > > > My tone? Look at the kind of responses I get from people like you. > > Stuff like "Of Course that won't work". Your tone is just as cocky as > > you think mine is. > > > >>>a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to give > > >>>you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts > > > I don't see how they are frantic, just separated out. And I don't see > > all the people here who are getting fed up. > > > I want you and Morning to know that some of the responses are > > definitely passive aggressive on your side to even start with. Do you > > need examples? > > > I'm not here to argue. I'll do my best to consolidate my replies. > > And understand that people are human, sure I'm frustrated with the > > fact that the author is no longer to be found. Don't take someone's > > frustration to the point of saying I'm being negative when I was not > > THAT negative. What a way to blow this entire thing out of the water. > > > On Jul 9, 2:08 pm, Charlie <charlie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > you sir are a complete ingrate! > > > You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple > > > carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the last > > > posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue that > > > everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts, condemning > > > someone's code ( on a plugin that 100's of people have used I might add), > > > not reading replies with solutions......and to top it off this post makes > > > it sound like others with busy lives are just sitting around waiting to > > > help you! > > > This post is rude! Wake up! Any reply to MorningZ's post I would have > > > been expecting to see some thanks, rather than being a pompous A**. My > > > bet is you just burned a big bridge to any further assistance with an > > > attitude like the one displayed here > > > I'm betting I speak for many others who are tired of the inbox clutter > > > from your carousel problems > > > expresso wrote:how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving > > > information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before I > > > post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing you > > > what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving enough > > > information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am, > > > MorningZ<morni...@gmail.com>wrote:"so it's only respectful on my part to > > > start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the same > > > thread. Not cool. " You've got it backwards.... it makes more sense and > > > keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic..... As Liam points > > > out.... you already asked the index question, AND it was answered by > > > Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours > > > agohttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916... > > > and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with 2 > > > min apart two sentence ramblings on them all.... Realize what this list > > > for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help out > > > of our own time.... making it difficult to understand what you are > > > asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on and > > > on with the same stuff.... all that doesn't lend itself very well to > > > make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9, > > > 11:12 am, expresso<dschin...@gmail.com>wrote:Because sometimes I get into > > > other topics not related to my original posts in those other thread so > > > it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a different > > > topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool.On Jul 9, 9:30 am, > > > Liam Potter<radioactiv...@gmail.com>wrote:how about reading all the > > > replies to your other thread about this?$("#mycarousel > > > > li:eq(10)").css("margin-right", "5px");expresso wrote:Is it possible to > > > target certain <li> in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I thought > > > maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax right.I > > > thought maybe something like this would work but is has > > > not:$("#mycarousel > li").index(i).css("margin-right", "5px");
