Oh men..
C'mon!! threads are supposed to be to help people out..
If you want to fight, do it in private... cuz there is a lot of people that
may be interested in this topic too
and will find no help in your discussion... Don't be so selfish
----- Original Message -----
From: "expresso" <dschin...@gmail.com>
To: "jQuery (English)" <jquery-en@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:25 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Access <li> by item in the array
and you blow up at my wondering why the author of that plugin
put it on there... how the @#$% am i supposed to know?
if that's "blowing up" then you need to relax when you read replies.
That in no way was "blowing up".
On Jul 9, 2:24 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Morning, then tell my why the code is putting that in there straight
from the JCarousel plug-in
Because previous to that, you were pretty cocky about the way you said
that disabled is not part of a <div> Read the post.
YOu have to take that response above in context. I was in no way
trying to be cocky, just making a point that hey, it's in there so I
don't get why then.
On Jul 9, 2:22 pm, expresso <dschin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Charlie, I have said thanks in a lot of my posts.
> Second, I am customizing this control way beyond what most people
> have. And yes, it's pretty frustrating to say the least when you
> create a plugin and then disappear after 2 years. While it's open
> source, still. When you email the creator nicely asking him if he's
> still contributing and you get no response, and then the forums the
> pages for that Carousel are abandoned, one's got to wonder wtf.
> My tone? Look at the kind of responses I get from people like you.
> Stuff like "Of Course that won't work". Your tone is just as cocky as
> you think mine is.
> >>>a number of the last posts directed back to you have been trying to
> >>>give you a clue that everyone is getting really tired of all the
> >>>frantic posts
> I don't see how they are frantic, just separated out. And I don't see
> all the people here who are getting fed up.
> I want you and Morning to know that some of the responses are
> definitely passive aggressive on your side to even start with. Do you
> need examples?
> I'm not here to argue. I'll do my best to consolidate my replies.
> And understand that people are human, sure I'm frustrated with the
> fact that the author is no longer to be found. Don't take someone's
> frustration to the point of saying I'm being negative when I was not
> THAT negative. What a way to blow this entire thing out of the water.
> On Jul 9, 2:08 pm, Charlie <charlie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > you sir are a complete ingrate!
> > You have had endless help from numerous people for 2 weeks on a simple
> > carousel. I don't think you understand the tone of a number of the
> > last posts directed back to you have been trying to give you a clue
> > that everyone is getting really tired of all the frantic posts,
> > condemning someone's code ( on a plugin that 100's of people have used
> > I might add), not reading replies with solutions......and to top it
> > off this post makes it sound like others with busy lives are just
> > sitting around waiting to help you!
> > This post is rude! Wake up! Any reply to MorningZ's post I would have
> > been expecting to see some thanks, rather than being a pompous A**. My
> > bet is you just burned a big bridge to any further assistance with an
> > attitude like the one displayed here
> > I'm betting I speak for many others who are tired of the inbox clutter
> > from your carousel problems
> > expresso wrote:how the hell am I being rude? And second, I am giving
> > information to help you help me. Again I try all sorts of shit before
> > I post stuff. I don't just post on every step of the way. I am showing
> > you what I have tried. So you either get called out for not giving
> > enough information or giving too little. Chill On Jul 9, 11:04 am,
> > MorningZ<morni...@gmail.com>wrote:"so it's only respectful on my part
> > to start a new thread on a different topic that's veering off in the
> > same thread. Not cool. " You've got it backwards.... it makes more
> > sense and keeps the clutter out if you stay in the same topic..... As
> > Liam points out.... you already asked the index question, AND it was
> > answered by Charlie, in the topic you created just 13 hours
> > agohttp://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/8832916...
> > and yet, here's an identical topic asking the identical question with
> > 2 min apart two sentence ramblings on them all.... Realize what this
> > list for what it is: a mailing list where lots of us provide free help
> > out of our own time.... making it difficult to understand what you are
> > asking, being rude to people trying to show you the way, rambling on
> > and on with the same stuff.... all that doesn't lend itself very well
> > to make your issues worth other peoples time and effort . On Jul 9,
> > 11:12 am, expresso<dschin...@gmail.com>wrote:Because sometimes I get
> > into other topics not related to my original posts in those other
> > thread so it's only respectful on my part to start a new thread on a
> > different topic that's veering off in the same thread. Not cool.On Jul
> > 9, 9:30 am, Liam Potter<radioactiv...@gmail.com>wrote:how about
> > reading all the replies to your other thread about this?$("#mycarousel
> > > li:eq(10)").css("margin-right", "5px");expresso wrote:Is it possible
> > to target certain <li> in an unordered list by index with jQuery? I
> > thought maybe I could use .index but was not able to get the syntax
> > right.I thought maybe something like this would work but is has
> > not:$("#mycarousel > li").index(i).css("margin-right", "5px");
