Because Ext doesn't consider file size when optimizing their DOMQuery
engine. With jQuery, we try to find a good balance between keeping the
core file size down while providing very good performance.
Rey...
weepy wrote:
How come Ext is so fast !!
On Oct 26, 9:30 am, "Andy Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone simply explain what the colors indicate for any specific row?
Red?
Orange?
Green?
Grey?
Black?
Also, in IE7, these are the results I got (for what it's worth):
Dojo query 0.9: 1020
jQuery1.2: 1350
Mootools r887: 2525
Prototype 1.6.0: 2857
Ext 1.1: 7: 477
-----Original Message-----
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 11:22 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: jQuery1.2benchmark
Run this test in Internet Explorer and look at the results. jQuery is
optimized for Internet Explorer which is the most widely used browser out.
When you run the same tests in IE, you'll see that we perform much better
and our on par with all of the libs.
Also, theSlickSpeedtest suite has already been discussed in great detail
on this list and many of the actual selectors specified are not real-world
examples that would represent any type of real performance in an actual
application. The performance of jQuery's DOM selector engine is actually
very good and to date, we've not received any complaints from our users
including Digg, NBC, IBM or Google.
With that said, our focus is on improving features for jQuery.SlickSpeedis not
on our radar.
Rey....
Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns wrote:
Has anyone seen this one?
http://alexandre-mercier.vinnac.org/slickspeed/
jQuery does not perform that well there.
Lafriks
