I did and this link was not to offence anyone. I was just curius what do others think about it :) And also that there are some missing features for jquery that other frameworks does have.
Lafriks On 10/26/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Run this test in Internet Explorer and look at the results. jQuery is > optimized for Internet Explorer which is the most widely used browser > out. When you run the same tests in IE, you'll see that we perform much > better and our on par with all of the libs. > > Also, the SlickSpeed test suite has already been discussed in great > detail on this list and many of the actual selectors specified are not > real-world examples that would represent any type of real performance in > an actual application. The performance of jQuery's DOM selector engine > is actually very good and to date, we've not received any complaints > from our users including Digg, NBC, IBM or Google. > > With that said, our focus is on improving features for jQuery. > SlickSpeed is not on our radar. > > Rey.... > > Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns wrote: > > Has anyone seen this one? > > > > http://alexandre-mercier.vinnac.org/slickspeed/ > > > > jQuery does not perform that well there. > > > > Lafriks > > > -- Lafriks =)
