[lang=en]
On 10/29/07, Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > lang selector could be useful > > Lafriks > > On 10/29/07, Jeffrey Kretz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Lafriks, > > > > Hello and welcome to the forum. What features would you like to see in > > jQuery that are missing? > > > > JK > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns > > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 3:56 AM > > To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com > > Subject: [jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.2 benchmark > > > > > > I did and this link was not to offence anyone. I was just curius what > > do others think about it :) And also that there are some missing > > features for jquery that other frameworks does have. > > > > Lafriks > > > > On 10/26/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Run this test in Internet Explorer and look at the results. jQuery is > > > optimized for Internet Explorer which is the most widely used browser > > > out. When you run the same tests in IE, you'll see that we perform much > > > better and our on par with all of the libs. > > > > > > Also, the SlickSpeed test suite has already been discussed in great > > > detail on this list and many of the actual selectors specified are not > > > real-world examples that would represent any type of real performance in > > > an actual application. The performance of jQuery's DOM selector engine > > > is actually very good and to date, we've not received any complaints > > > from our users including Digg, NBC, IBM or Google. > > > > > > With that said, our focus is on improving features for jQuery. > > > SlickSpeed is not on our radar. > > > > > > Rey.... > > > > > > Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns wrote: > > > > Has anyone seen this one? > > > > > > > > http://alexandre-mercier.vinnac.org/slickspeed/ > > > > > > > > jQuery does not perform that well there. > > > > > > > > Lafriks > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Lafriks =) > > > > > > > -- > Lafriks =) >
