Lafriks, Hello and welcome to the forum. What features would you like to see in jQuery that are missing?
JK -----Original Message----- From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 3:56 AM To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com Subject: [jQuery] Re: jQuery 1.2 benchmark I did and this link was not to offence anyone. I was just curius what do others think about it :) And also that there are some missing features for jquery that other frameworks does have. Lafriks On 10/26/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Run this test in Internet Explorer and look at the results. jQuery is > optimized for Internet Explorer which is the most widely used browser > out. When you run the same tests in IE, you'll see that we perform much > better and our on par with all of the libs. > > Also, the SlickSpeed test suite has already been discussed in great > detail on this list and many of the actual selectors specified are not > real-world examples that would represent any type of real performance in > an actual application. The performance of jQuery's DOM selector engine > is actually very good and to date, we've not received any complaints > from our users including Digg, NBC, IBM or Google. > > With that said, our focus is on improving features for jQuery. > SlickSpeed is not on our radar. > > Rey.... > > Lauris Bukšis-Haberkorns wrote: > > Has anyone seen this one? > > > > http://alexandre-mercier.vinnac.org/slickspeed/ > > > > jQuery does not perform that well there. > > > > Lafriks > > > -- Lafriks =)
