On Tuesday, June 12, 2007 7:25 AM Rey Bango <> said: > With that said, its definitely our turn to get things ramped up but > we're kind of in a quandary. See, one of the benefits of jQuery is its > very small file size. We're still the smallest library out there and > our overall functionality is on par with any of the ones listed.
[snip] > Considering that we are, IMO, the project thats most in tune with its > community, your feedback is definitely most welcome. My suggestion would be to create two versions of jQuery. One being the standard (small filesize, slow selectors) version and the other being a much larger (large filesize, fast selectors) version. The jQuery website would push the download of the normal library but it would also explain the differences between the two. "If you're working with large projects with over 500 selectors*, download jQuery's big brother, jQuery-TurboExtreme(!). It has the added benefit of much faster selectoring** but with a much larger filesize." Chris. * Is that what they're called? Selectors? ** I just made that word up but feel free to use it. Royalty free too! :)
