Someone once said to me "this will be a moot point by 2008" - but I
totally disagreed with them.  Yes countries like the UK, USA, Canada
and Japan may have > 80% coverage and > 50% subscription rates, but in
these countries as you say there are still a large proportion of users
on dialup.

Many people here in UK cannot get speeds of > 2Mbps (now considered
the minimum broadband level) - I'm lucky if I hit 4Mbps on my line,
and my work is still on a 1Mbps ADSL line shared between the whole
office of 15 people.

And don't even get me started on the emerging markets in Africa and
South America......

I've was taught that a start page should be no larger than 500kb in
size, and for Apple to have >700k in just JS, that's just silly.

And to top it off...Apple have released Safari on Windows - yet
another browser to saturate an already crowded market where no one
browser is standards complant and it just makes more work for us
developers.

Anyway, my point I'm making is that jQuery is almost perfect as it is,
and I wouldn't want it to be bloated, but there is leaway to increase
its size a little and still be able to provide highly optimised sites.
If jQuery is one of the slowest libraries out there, then it SHOULD be
optimised - newcomers are going to look at there figures and make a
decision on it - good or bad.  But by providing the middle ground of
maybe being one of the faster ones but still being smaller than
fastest lib, then maybe more people will consider using it.

My 2p



On 6/12/07, Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> I would guess that most (at least a large percentage) of their target
> audience has broadband.

Last weekend I was over a friends house with dial-up and I was amazed at
how completely unusable the web was for me...

Gmail, my local weather site, news - all took forever to load up... I no
longer develop public facing sites - but if it's been awhile since
you've tried surfing with a modem - I'd give it a try now and then just
to remember what a majority of people are experiencing on the web...

Sept 2006:
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2006/09/jd_power_high_speed.html
"The study finds that 56 percent of residential ISP customers subscribe
to high-speed Internet service -- an increase of 11 percentage points
from 2005."

So I'm guessing in 07 you are still looking at 40%+ using dialup.  That
said - I'd vote for smaller file sizes...

Jim

"There is more to life than simply increasing its speed." ~Gandhi




--
Tane Piper
http://webrocket.wordpress.com

This email is: [ ] blogable [ x ] ask first [ ] private

Reply via email to