ijuma commented on code in PR #19167:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/19167#discussion_r2009192580


##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/common/requests/FetchResponse.java:
##########
@@ -286,4 +291,12 @@ private static FetchResponseData toMessage(Errors error,
                 .setSessionId(sessionId)
                 .setResponses(topicResponseList);
     }
+
+    private static FetchResponseData 
convertNullRecordsToEmpty(FetchResponseData fetchResponseData) {
+        fetchResponseData.responses().stream()
+            .flatMap(response -> response.partitions().stream())
+            .filter(partition -> partition.records() == null)
+            .forEach(partition -> partition.setRecords(MemoryRecords.EMPTY));

Review Comment:
   The fetch path is perf sensitive and we are adding runtime cost every time 
even though this should never be required (i.e. the calling code should be 
doing the right thing already). Would a nested foreach loop be more efficient 
here?



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: jira-unsubscr...@kafka.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to