On Sun, 19 Dec 1999 13:17:23 +0000, Telsa Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >In fact, you might extend it (or add a different one) for women who >don't work with it, but who just use it. I am becoming more and more >convinced that there's a lot out there, but they don't advertise >their existence. After the abuse I took on linux.mit.edu #linux the other night, I can understand why. (No, Alan was not there.) I also had someone call me an "uppity bitch" the other day in a "discussion" over the relative merits of using Javascript to validate user input on Web forms (I claimed that you have to validate the data at the server anyway because you can't trust the user's client to behave; he said that this was ridiculous). I suspect he assumed that because I'm female I don't code.... Sigh. Kelly ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- [issues] list of women in open source Kirrily 'Skud' Robert
- Re: [issues] list of women in open source Robert Kiesling
- Re: [issues] list of women in open source skud
- Re: [issues] list of women in open sour... Robert Kiesling
- Re: [issues] list of women in open sour... Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [issues] list of women in open ... Kirrily 'Skud' Robert
- Re: [issues] list of women in open ... Caitlyn Martin
- Re: [issues] list of women in open ... Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [issues] list of women in ... Robert Kiesling
- Re: [issues] list of women... Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [issues] list of w... Kirrily 'Skud' Robert
- Re: [issues] list of w... Robert Kiesling
- Re: [issues] list of w... Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [issues] list of w... Robert Kiesling
- Re: [issues] list of women in open sour... Telsa Gwynne
- Re: [issues] list of women in open ... Kirrily 'Skud' Robert
- Re: [issues] list of women in ... franzoni
- Re: [issues] list of women in open ... Jenn V.