morazow commented on code in PR #182: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink-docker/pull/182#discussion_r1509007392
########## .github/workflows/ci.yml: ########## @@ -17,14 +17,22 @@ name: "CI" on: [push, pull_request] +env: + TAR_URL: "https://s3.amazonaws.com/flink-nightly/flink-1.20-SNAPSHOT-bin-scala_2.12.tgz"; + jobs: ci: + name: CI using JDK ${{ matrix.java_version }} runs-on: ubuntu-latest + strategy: + fail-fast: false + max-parallel: 1 Review Comment: That is also what I think, they are run on isolated VMs. I already restarted multiple CI runs [`run1`](https://github.com/morazow/flink-docker/actions/runs/8096425906), [`run2`](https://github.com/morazow/flink-docker/actions/runs/8096433961) on my fork. These should create four containers with same name. But so far, I could not reproduce the initial issue. I didn't want to introduce flaky tests, going forward I would suggest to remove the set 1 parallelism. We could address it again if we see similar issue. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@flink.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
