Hi Paul, > > I'm unsure that this is the correct change too. To my ear, the new > > text implies that there was a possibility in the protocol to notify > > the sender, but for some reason it wasn't happen. Instead, the current > > text tries to say that currently there is no way to notify the sender. > > > > Perhaps better "if the sender could be notified" ? > > Could be is not strong enough. If we extend IKEv2 it could be (but not have > been) > notified. > > How about > > if the sender has been notified somehow
OK. > >> AH and ESP rely on the Internet Key Exchange protocol version 2 -> AH > >> and ESP are usually established using the Internet Key Exchange > >> protocol > > > > Fixed. > > And yes, make the doc Standards Track so we don’t get any downref issues > later. > It modifies a standard track RFC. It doesn’t matter that it doesn’t add > entries to any > registries. OK, done. Regards, Valery. > Paul= _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
