Valery Smyslov writes: > one potential problem, that I want to be resolved, is the status of > this document. > > Currently it is an Informational document, since it doesn't define > any protocol (and in fact it doesn't even have any RFC 2119 > language). But it updates RFC 7296, which is a Standards Track > document. > > I'm a bit unsure whether this is formally OK. Any advice is > appreciated.
I marked it as standard track in the datatracker. Even if it does not have any RFC 2119 language, it still updates 7296 and I think that makes it standard track. -- kivi...@iki.fi _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list -- ipsec@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ipsec-le...@ietf.org
