> Even if WESP is approved for use with encrypted traffic, that does not mean > that it will supplant ESP. ESP still has a smaller header than WESP, so for > environments where there is no intent to accommodate middlebox snooping, ESP > is still preferable.
I agree with Steve here that extending WESP to support encryption does not mean that it will be replacing ESP. The latter would still get used, as i noted in my earlier email, in environments where there is no need for deep packet inspection. Jack _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
