Hey All, I've been putting some thought into this too. I'm thinking it might be time for Zachary to pass the maintainer torch onto someone. It has been some time since the last ioQuake3 release and it seems like he has consistently been busy with other things for some time now.
Of course, anyone if free fork their own project, but people are familiar with the ioQuake3 project. It would be a waist to throw that brand recognition away. And no, I wouldn't be a good maintainer at this point. But it is likely that someone out there is willing and capable. Don't get me wrong. Zachary did great work with this project. But it is the nature of people for their interests to change. Open source projects frequently start and end in this manner. Sincerely, eviljoel On 03/23/2014 05:19 PM, Vincent P. Ellis wrote: > There are lot's of PR's piling up on ioquake3's GitHub > page: https://github.com/ioquake/ioq3/pulls > > Some of them are crap, some of them are useful and a few are pure gold. > Why isn't there a discussion on this list, or on GitHub itself, about > each PR? And why isn't anyone accepting or rejecting them? People are > trying to contribute, but end up just being ignored. > > > Vincent Ellis > C/C++ Technician > vinc...@linuxmail.org > El Paso, TX > > > _______________________________________________ > ioquake3 mailing list > ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org > http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org > By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ioquake3 mailing list ioquake3@lists.ioquake.org http://lists.ioquake.org/listinfo.cgi/ioquake3-ioquake.org By sending this message I agree to love ioquake3 and libsdl.
